 |
» » »
Biometrics Technology
» » » » » Biometrics
Products » » » » » » Other
Resources » » » Sites of
Interest » » » »
»
»
»

|
 |
 |
Biometrics: You Should Be Your Own Password
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
BIOMETRICS FAQ:
Why Biometrics?
Biometrics authentication refers to security measures for
automatic identification of a person based on his/her physiological or
behavioral characteristics.This method of identification is preferred over traditional
methods involving passwords and PIN numbers for various reasons:
(i) the person to be identified is required to be physically
present at the point-of-identification;
(ii) identification based on biometric techniques obviates
the need to remember a password or carry a token. With the increased use
of computers as vehicles of information technology, it is necessary to
restrict access to sensitive/personal data.

|
|
BIOMETRICS FAQ:
How is it Done?
Here are some of the security
measures biometrics authentication provides: By replacing
PINs, biometric techniques can potentially prevent unauthorized access
to or fraudulent use of ATMs, cellular phones,
smart cards, desktop PCs, workstations, and computer networks.
PINs and passwords may be forgotten, and token
based methods of identification like passports and driver's licenses may
be forged, stolen, or lost. Thus biometric based systems of identification
are receiving considerable interest.
Various types of biometric systems are being
used for real-time identification, the most popular are based on face,
iris and fingerprint
matching. However, there are other biometric systems that utilize retinal
scan, speech, signatures, veins, and hand geometry. These
are also optimal for authentication. |
|
Evolving Biometrics
INTERESTING VIDEOS:
TASER
#1
TASER
#2
Biometrics is a rapidly evolving technology
which has been widely used in forensics such as criminal identification
and prison security. 
The security measures biometric authentication
provides are tremendous. Recent advancements in biometric sensors and
matching algorithms have led to the deployment of biometric
authentication in a large number of civilian applications. There is an
increas in complexity in algorithms data structures used in biometric
sensors, from the fingerprint component to hand
geometry recognition.
Biometric authentication
methods can be used to prevent unauthorized access to
ATMs, cellular phones, smart cards, desktop PCs, workstations, and computer
networks. It can be used during transactions conducted via telephone and
Internet (electronic commerce and electronic banking).
In automobiles, biometrics can replace keys
with key-less entry and key-less ignition. Due to increased security threats,
many countries have started using biometrics for border control and national
ID cards. |
|
types of biometrics system..
Among all the
biometric techniques, fingerprint-based
identification is the oldest method which has been successfully used
in numerous applications. It has been the subject of much biometric
marketing.
Everyone is
known to have unique, immutable fingerprints. A fingerprint
is made of a series of ridges and furrows on the surface of the finger.
The uniqueness
of a fingerprint can be determined by the pattern of ridges and furrows
as well as the minutiae points. Minutiae points are local ridge characteristics
that occur at either a ridge bifurcation or a ridge ending.

|
|
Minutae-based and correlation
based Matching
fingerprint
matching techniques can be placed into two categories:
minutae-based and correlation based. Minutiae-based techniques first find
minutiae points and then map their relative placement on the finger.
However,
there are some difficulties when using this approach. It is difficult
to extract the minutiae points accurately when the fingerprint is of low
quality. Also this method does not take into account the global pattern
of ridges and furrows.
The correlation-based
method is able to overcome some of the difficulties of the minutiae-based
approach. However, it has some of its own shortcomings. Correlation-based
techniques require the precise location of a registration point and are
affected by image translation and rotation. |
|
Matching Problems
Fingerprint
matching based on minutiae has problems in matching different sized (unregistered)
minutiae patterns. Local ridge structures can not be completely characterized
by minutiae.

Researchers are trying an alternate representation of fingerprints
which will capture more local information and yield a fixed length code
for the fingerprint. The matching will then hopefully become a relatively
simple task of calculating the Euclidean distance will between the two
codes. |
|
A commercial fingerprint-based authentication system requires
a very low False Reject Rate (FAR) for a given False Accept Rate (FAR).
This is very difficult to achieve with any one technique. An easy technique
may be a popular fingerprint recognition technique, but it will not necessarily
yield the best results.
Researchers are investigating methods to pool evidence from
various matching techniques to increase the overall accuracy
of the system. In a real application, the sensor, the acquisition
system and the variation in performance of the system over time is very
critical. Every biometric system algorithm is different.
 |
|
BIOMETRICS FAQ:
Is There More About Fingerprint Biometrics?
Large volumes of fingerprints are collected and stored
everyday in a wide range of applications including forensics, access control,
and driver license registration.
An automatic recognition of
people based on fingerprints requires that the input fingerprint be matched
with a large number of fingerprints in a database (FBI database contains
approximately 70 million fingerprints!).
To cut the search time and computational complexity, it
is desirable to classify these fingerprints in an accurate and consistent
manner so that the input fingerprint is required to be matched only with
a subset of the fingerprints in the database.
|
|
Biometrics of Fingerprint Classification
Fingerprint classification is a technique to assign a fingerprint
into one of the several pre-specified types already established in the
literature which can provide an indexing mechanism.
Fingerprint classification can be viewed as a coarse
level matching of the fingerprints. An input fingerprint is first matched
at a coarse level to one of the pre-specified types and then, at a finer
level, it is compared to the subset of the database containing that type
of fingerprints only.
Researchers
have developed an algorithm to classify fingerprints into five classes,
namely, whorl, right loop, left loop, arch, and tented arch .
|
|
Fingerprint
Image Enhancement
A critical step in automatic fingerprint matching is to
automatically and reliably extract minutiae from the input fingerprint
images. However, the performance of a minutiae extraction algorithm relies
heavily on the quality of the input fingerprint images.
In order to ensure that the performance of an automatic
fingerprint identification/verification system will be robust with respect
to the quality of the fingerprint images, it is essential to incorporate
a fingerprint enhancement algorithm in the minutiae extraction module.
|
|
Biometric Enhancement
Researchers have developed a fast
fingerprint enhancement algorithm, which can adaptively improve the clarity
of ridge and furrow structures of input fingerprint images based on the
estimated local ridge orientation and frequency.
They have evaluated the performance of the
image enhancement algorithm using the goodness index of the extracted
minutiae and the accuracy of an online fingerprint verification system.
Because of the difficulty in determining why the fingerprint is
different for each person, studies have been done. Experimental
results show that incorporating the enhancement algorithms improves both
the goodness index and the verification accuracy. |
|
BIOMETRICS FAQ:
What is Biometric Hand Geometry?
Unlike fingerprints, the human hand
isn't unique. One can use finger length, thickness, and curvature
for the purposes of verification but not for identification.
For
some kinds of access control like immigration and border control, invasive
biometrics (eg., fingerprints) systems may not be desirable as they help
security, but infringe on privacy. In such situations
it is desirable to have a biometric system that is sufficient for verification.
Herein lies the value of
HAND
RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY.
|
|
Biometrics of Hand Geometry
As hand geometry is not distinctive, it is the ideal choice.
Furthermore, hand geometry data is easier to collect. With
fingerprint collection good frictional skin is required by imaging systems,
and with retina-based
recognition systems, special lighting is necessary.
Additionally, hand geometry can be easily combined with
other biometrics, namely fingerprint. One can envision a system
where fingerprints are used for (infrequent) identification and hand geometry
is used for (frequent) verification. |
|
Face
Detection Biometrics
The face retrieval problem, known as face
detection, can be defined as follows: given an arbitrary black and white,
still image, find the location and size of every human face it contains.
|
|
Human Face Detection
There are many applications in which human
face detection plays a very important role: it represents the first step
in a fully automatic face recognition system, it can be used in image
database indexing/searching by content, in surveillance systems and in
human-computer interfaces. |
|
Why Face
Recognition
It also provides insight on how to approach other pattern
recognition problems involving deformable textured objects.
At the same time, it is one of the harder problems in pattern
recognition. |
|
Multi-biometrics
An automatic personal identification system based solely
on fingerprints or faces is often not able to meet the system performance
requirements. Face recognition is fast but not reliable while fingerprint
verification is reliable but inefficient in database retrieval. A person
can open a door by a scan of their retina,
and there are other ways to resolve that problem. For instance, voice
is becoming more popular as a biometric authentication, where private
passwords are not acceptable. |
|
Higher Biometric Performance
A biometric system which relies only on a single biometric
identifier in making a personal identification is often not able to meet
the desired performance requirements. Identification based on multiple
biometrics represents an emerging trend. |
|
Get Biometric Help
|
|
Get Biometric Help
|
|
|
|
History of Biometrics
While biometrics did not show up in practice in Western
cultures until late in the 19th century, it was being used in China by
at least the 14th century. 
An explorer and writer by the name of Joao de Barros wrote
that Chinese merchants stamped children’s palm prints and footprints on
paper with ink. The merchants did this as a way to distinguish young children
from one another. |
|
Biometrics in the West
In the West, identification relied heavily simply upon “photographic
memory” until the French police desk clerk and anthropologist Alphonse
Bertillon developed the anthropometric system (later also known as Bertillonage)
in 1883.
This was the first precise, scientific system that was widely used to
identify criminals. It turned biometrics into a field of study. |
|
How Biometrics Worked
It worked by precisely measuring certain lengths
and widths of the head and body, as well as recording individual markings
such as tattoos and scars. Bertillon’s system was widely adopted in the
West until the system’s flaws became apparent – mainly problems with differing
methods of measurement and changing measurements.
After that, Western
police forces turned to fingerprinting – essentially the same system seen
in China hundreds of years prior. In recent years biometrics has moved
from simply fingerprinting, to many different methods that use various
physical and behavioral measurements. The uses of biometrics have also
increased, from just identification to security systems and more. |
|
Definition of Biometrics
Biometrics (ancient Greek: bios ="life",
metron ="measure") is the study of automated methods for uniquely recognizing
humans based upon one or more intrinsic physical or behavioural traits.
In information technology, biometric authentication
refers to technologies that measure and analyze human physical and behavioural
characteristics for authentication purposes.
Examples of physical characteristics include
fingerprints,
eye retinas and irises, (which is known as
an iris recognition technology, or a retina
recognition system)
facial patterns and hand measurements; while
examples of mostly behavioral characteristics include signature, gait
and typing patterns. Can you imagine opening the door to your house by
some touchless sensors' approval?
Voice is considered a mix of both physical
and behavioral characteristics. However, it can be argued that all biometric
traits share physical and behavioural aspects. |
|
Biometric System
In a typical IT biometric system, a person registers with the system
when one or more of his physical and behavioral characteristics are obtained.
This information is then processed by a numerical algorithm, and entered
into a database. The algorithm creates a digital representation of the
obtained biometric.
If the user is new to the system, he or she enrolls, which means that
the digital template of the biometric is entered into the database. |
|
Templates for Biometrics
Each subsequent attempt to use the system, or authenticate, requires
the biometric of the user to be captured again, and processed into a digital
template.
That template is then compared to those existing in the database to determine
a match. The process of converting the acquired biometric into a digital
template for comparison is completed each time the user attempts to authenticate
to the system.
The comparison process involves the use of a Hamming distance. This is
a measurement of how similar two bit strings are. |
|
Error Rates
For example, in this methodology two identical bit strings
have a Hamming Distance of zero, while two totally dissimilar ones have
a Hamming Distance of one.
Thus, the Hamming distance measures the percentage of dissimilar bits
out of the number of comparisons made.
Ideally, when a user logs in, nearly all of his features match; then
when someone else tries to log in, who does not fully match, and the system
will not allow the new person to log in.
Current technologies have widely varying Equal Error Rates, varying
from as low as 60% and as high as 99.9%. |
|
Performance of Biometrics
Performance of a biometric measure is usually referred to in terms of
the false accept rate (FAR), the false non match or reject rate (FRR),
and the failure to enroll rate (FTE or FER).

The FAR measures the percent of invalid users who are incorrectly accepted
as genuine users, while the FRR measures the percent of valid users who
are rejected as impostors. |
|
Real-world Biometrics

In real-world biometric systems the FAR and FRR can typically
be traded off against each other by changing some parameter.
One of the most common measures of real-world biometric
systems is the rate at which both accept and reject errors are equal:
the equal error rate (EER), also known as the cross-over error rate (CER).
The lower the EER or CER, the more accurate the system
is considered to be. An EER is desirable for a biometric system because
it balances the sensitivity of the system. |
|
Biometric Threshholds
Claimed error rates sometimes involve idiosyncratic or subjective elements.
For example, one biometrics vendor set the acceptance threshold high,
to minimize false accepts.
In the trial, three attempts were allowed, and so a false reject was
counted only if all three attempts failed. At the same time, when measuring
performance biometrics (e.g. writing, speech etc.), opinions may differ
on what constitutes a false reject.
If a signature verification system is trained with an initial and a surname,
can a false reject be legitimately claimed when it then rejects the signature
incorporating a full first name? |
|
DNA & Biometrics
Despite these misgivings, biometric systems have the
potential to identify individuals with a very high degree of certainty.
Forensic DNA evidence enjoys a particularly high degree of public trust
at present (ca. 2004) and substantial claims are being made in respect
of iris recognition technology, which has the capacity to discriminate
between individuals with identical DNA, such as monozygotic twins. There
are multiple iris biometrics system api's.

|
|
Biometric Comparison
The figure below (Yun 2003) compares several biometrics
with each other against seven categories:
* Universality describes how common a biometric is found
in each individual.
* Uniqueness is how well the biometric separates one individual
from another.
* Permanence measures how well a biometric resists aging.
* Collectability explains how easy it is to acquire a
biometric for measurement.
* Performance indicates the accuracy, speed, and robustness
of the system capturing the biometric.
* Acceptability indicates the degree of approval of a
technology by the public in everyday life.
* Circumvention is how easy it is to fool the authentication
system.
Yun ranks each biometric based on the categories as being
either low, medium, or high. A low ranking indicates poor performance
in the evaluation criterion whereas a high ranking indicates a very good
performance.

A comparison of biometrics from: Yun,
Yau Wei. The ‘123' of Biometric Technology, 2003 |
|
Biometric System Issues and Concerns
As with many interesting and powerful developments of technology, excessive
concern with the biometric may have the effect of eclipsing a more general
critical faculty. Even though the FBI Fingerprint Department may use biometrics,
biometrics may become associated with severe miscarriages of justice if
bedazzlement with the performance of the technology blinds us to the following
possibilities. An individual could:
- plant DNA at the scene of the crime
- associate another's identity with his biometrics, thereby impersonating
without arousing suspicion
- fool a fingerprint detector by using a piece of sticky tape with an
authentic fingerprint on it
- fool an iris recognition camera by showing a photo of an iris pupil
- interfere with the interface between a biometric device and the host
system, so that a "fail" message gets converted to a "pass".

|
|
BIOMETRIC FAQ:
Are There Problems with Biometrics?
Concerns about Identity theft
through biometrics use have not been resolved. If a person's credit card
number is stolen, for example, it can cause them great difficulty.
If their iris scan is stolen, though,
and it allows someone else to access personal information or financial
accounts, the damage could be irreversible. There has to be high security.
Often, biometric technologies have
been rolled out without adequate safeguards for personal information gathered
about individuals. Also, the biometric solution to identity theft is only
as good as the information in the database that is used for verifying
identity.
Problems of getting accurate and
usuable initial information -- witness the current troubles with the No
fly list of the Dept of Homeland security.
Presumably after the initial information
is correctly stored, future computer error or vandalism (hacking) would
prevent biometrics from being 100% foolproof against idenity theft. |
|
BIOMETRIC FAQ:
Are There Fears About Biometrics?
Though biometrics often are touted
as a way to restrict criminality, privacy advocates fear biometrics may
be used to diminish personal liberties of law abiding citizens as well.

Developments in a huge range of new
technologies besides biometrics - digital video, infrared, x-ray, wireless,
global positioning satellite systems, image scanning, voice recognition,
DNA, and brain wave fingerprinting - provide government with new ways
to "search" individuals and collect vast databases of information on law-abiding
members of the public. The fingerprint login device
is a favorite, as it only has to search through a fingerprint
database. In fact, many consumers are now purchasing biometric
fingerprint sensor laptops.
Biometric identity verification has a huge
lead in fingerprint software. |
|
Canada and Biometrics
Canada has recently introduced biometrics in
the use of passports with the help of digitized photos. The passports
contain a chip that holds a picture of the person and personal information
such as name and date of birth.

This technology is being used at border crossings that
have electronic readers that are able to read the chip in the cards and
verify the information present in the card and on the passport.
This method allows for increased efficiency and accuracy
of identifying people at the border crossing. CANPASS, developed by Canada
Customs, is currently being used by some major airports that have kiosks
set up to take digital pictures of a person’s eye as a means of identification. |
|
United States & Biometrics
The United States government has become a strong advocate of biometrics
with the increase in security concerns in recent years. Starting in 2005,
US passports with facial (image-based) biometric data are scheduled to
be produced.

Privacy activists in many countries have criticized the technology's
use for the potential harm to civil liberties, privacy, and the risk of
identity theft. Currently, there is some apprehension in the United States
(and the European Union) that the information can be "skimmed" and identify
people's citizenship remotely for criminal intent, such as kidnapping.
|
|
Biometric Passport Control
A Biometric passport is an Information Age identity document
that uses biometrics to authenticate the citizenship of travelers. The
passport’s critical information is stored on a tiny computer chip, much
like information stored on smartcards. Like some smartcards, the passport
book design calls for an embedded contactless chip that is able to hold
digital signature data to ensure the integrity of the passport and the
biometric data. The current staged biometrics for this type of identification
system is fingerprint recognition, digital imaging, and retinal scans.

For example, this would allow a computer to verify your
identity by measuring the distance between your eyes. |
|
Opposition to Biometrics
Privacy Activists in many countries question and
protest the lack of information about exactly what the passports' chip
will contain. The main problem they point out is that data on the passports
can be transferred with touchless radio frequency identification
(RFID) technology systems (like wireless technology) which can
become a major vulnerability. Although this would allow ID-check
computers to obtain your information without a physical connection, it
would also allow anyone with the necessary equipment to perform the same
task. If the personal information and passport numbers on the chip aren't
encrypted, the information might wind up in the wrong hands. Vendors may
provide a sample RFID door access program before institutions go ahead
with any purchase decisions. |
|
Other Concerns
Additional concern has been raised about the technical feasibility of
biometrics in large-scale, real-world security applications.

This, combined with worries over added or unforseeable costs to the bearer,
led to strong oppostion against the bill allowing the development of the
British biometric national identity card, which uses the same biometric
identification technology as the proposed European biometric passport.
The British national passport latest security chip system has been hailed
as very successful. |
|
US Biometric Passport
A high level of security became the top priority
in 2001. This tightened security required border control to take bold
steps in cracking down on counterfeit paper passports. This concern led
to the idea of biometric security.The U.S. Government Printing Office
(GPO) issued awards to the top bidders of a program. The awards totaled
to roughly $1,000,000 for startup, development, and testing. The driving
force of the initiative is the US Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry
Reform Act of 2002 that stated such smartcard IDs will be able replace
visas.

|
|
US Visa Waiver Program
Countries participating in the U.S. Visa Waiver
Program are now required to start production of machine-readable passports

that comply with international standards and support
biometric identification. The citizens of these 27 countries will be able
to offer their country’s biometric passport to retain their activity with
visa-free traveling to the US. The goal of participating countries finally
comes together; now tightened security exists aiding in the re-establishment
of traveling ease. |
|
Biometric Word List
A biometric word list is a list of words
that can be implemented to authentically and reliably communicate
numeric information
by voice. The words in the list correspond to one of each of the 256 unique
byte values, and are
carefully chosen for their phonetic
distinctiveness. The properties of the human voice as the authentication
mechanism. The idea was originated by Phil
Zimmermann , the inventor of PGP
, and Patrick
Juola , a computational linguist
. |
|
Zimmerman's List
The first (and only?) biometric word
list is one developed by Zimmermann and Juola, with the assistance of
Zhahai
Stewart and Grady
Ward . It was developed to permit the verbal authentication
of Diffie-Hellman
key exchange , and of cryptographic key fingerprints
. The information conveyed using a biometric word list can also be
conveyed by simply reading decimal
or hexadecimal
numbers. However, some numbers sound similar to each other ("five"
and "nine"; "B" and "D"; etc.) and can lead to errors in "transmission",
so the conversion to words is used. It is similar to the use of the military
alphabet for the communication of letters. |
|
British national identity card
After many years of discussion through
successive governments, in 2003 then British Home Secretary David Blunkett
announced that the government intends to introduce a British national
identity card linked
to a national identity database, the National Identity Register, which
ID card detractors fear will track all residents of the UK throughout
their lives. The NIR database is planned to perform a key role in the
delivery of Government services over the Internet in the future. |
|
Expectations of Biometrics

The cards and database will record biometric
data, including fingerprints, digitised facial scan and iris scan.
With biometrics face recognition and advances in science
behind biometrics iris scanning, many changes in society are
expected. It is expected that by 2013
up to 80% of the working population will have some kind of biometric
identity document, with the cards becoming compulsory then.

|
|
Bill's Focus
Although the focus of the proposal is on the identity
cards themselves, not least in the title of the Bill, it is the National
Identity Register database that is the key component.

Due to the data stored on the Register, cards will not
be essential to establish identity, since all that will be required will
be to submit to a biometric scan. |
|
Other UK & Ireland Concerns
It has been reported in the Republic of Ireland that the introduction
of the card in the United Kingdom may lead to an Irish scheme. The details
were announced after the London bombings. The
main motivation of this is the Common Travel Area and proximity of Northern
Ireland. In July 2005 the UK indicated that it would use its European
Union Presidency (July-December 2005) to develop moves towards a Europe-wide
biometric ID scheme |
|
Facial Biometrics
A facial recognition system is a computer-driven application for automatically
identifying a person from a digital image. It does that by comparing selected
facial features in the live image and a facial database. It is typically
used for security systems and can be compared to other biometrics such
as fingerprint
or eye iris recognition systems.

The London Borough of Newham, in the UK, has a facial recognition system
built into their borough-wide CCTV system.
These systems are not all the same. One special type is a facial
thermography biometric system. |
|
Biometric Algorithms

Popular recognition algorithms include eigenface, fisherface, the Hidden
Markov model and the neuronal motivated Dynamic Link Matching. A newly
emerging trend, claimed to achieve previously unseen accuracies, is three-dimensional
face recognition. Another emerging trend uses the visual details of the
skin, as captured in standard digital or scanned images. |
|
Biometric Criticism
Critics of one such technology complain that it has, as of 2004, never
recognised a single criminal,
despite several criminals in the system's database living in the Borough
and the system having been running for several years. An experiment by
the local police department in Tampa, Florida, had similarly disappointing
results. |
|
3-D Facial Biometrics
Three-dimensional face recognition (3D face recognition) is a modality
of facial recognition methods in which the three-dimensional geometry
of the human face is used. It has been shown that

3D face recognition methods can achieve significantly higher accuracy
than their 2D counterparts, rivaling fingerprint recognition. |
|
3-D Accuracy
3D face recognition achieves better accuracy than its 2D counterpart
by measuring geometry of rigid features on the face. This
avoids such pitfalls of 2D face recognition algorithms as change in lighting,
different facial expressions, make-up and head orientation. Another approach
is to use the 3D model to improve accuracy of traditional image based
recognition by transforming the head into a known view. |
|
3-D Biometric Limitations
The main technological limitation of 3D face recognition
methods is the acquisition of 3D images, which usually requires a range
camera.
This is also a reason why 3D face recognition methods
have emerged significantly later (in the late 1980s) than 2D methods.
Recently commercial solutions have implemented depth perception by projecting
a grid onto the face and integrating video capture of it into a high resolution
3D model.

This allows for good recognition accuracy with low cost off-the-shelf
components. |
|
Biometric History - Europe
Elsewhere in the world up until the late 1800s, identification
largely relied upon "photographic memory." In the 1890s, an anthropologist
and police desk clerk in Paris named Alphonse Bertillon sought to fix
the problem of identifying convicted criminals and
turned biometrics into a distinct field of study. He developed a method
of multiple body measurements which got named after him (Bertillonage).
|
|
Biometric History - Europe
Bertillon's system was used by police authorities throughout
the world, until it quickly faded when it was discovered that some people
shared the same measurements and based on the measurements alone, two
people could get treated as one.
After
the failure of Bertillonage, the police started using finger printing,
which was developed by Richard Edward Henry of Scotland Yard, essentially
reverting to the same methods used by the Chinese for years. The technology
just wasn't up to the job at the time.
|
|
Modern Biometrics

In the past three decades biometrics has moved from a single method (fingerprinting)
to more than ten discreet methods. Companies involved with new methods
number in the hundreds and continue to improve their methods as the technology
available to them advances. Prices for the harware required continue to
fall making systems more feasible for low and mid-level budgets. |
|
Biometrics Systems of Today
As the industry grows however, so does the public
concern over privacy issues. Laws and regulations continue to be drafted
and standards are beginning to be developed. While no other biometric
has yet reached the breadth of use of fingerprinting,

some are beginning to be used in both legal and
business areas. Sometimes decisions are based on economics. The author
is doing research on biometric palm scanner prices. |
|
Usage of Biometrics
Biometrics measures are used in two major ways: Identification
and Verification. Identification is determining who
a person is. It involves taking the measured characteristic and trying
to find a match in a database containing records of people and that characteristic.

This biometric method can require a large amount of processing
power and some time if the database is very large. It is often used in
determining the identity of a suspect from crime scene information. |
|
Verification
Verification is determining if a person
is who they say they are. It involves taking the measured characteristic
and comparing it to the previously recorded data for that person. This
method requires less processing power and time, and is often used for
accessing places or information. You may have seen an airport
biometrics security access system, where they try to use the
best biometrics security control techniques-fingerprint
and otherwise. |
|
How Biometrics Works
Biometric devices consist of a reader or scanning device, software that
converts the gathered information into digital form, and a database that
stores the biometric data for comparison with previous records.
When converting the biometric input, the software identifies specific
points of data as match points. The match points are processed using an
algorithm into a value that can be compared with biometric data in the
database. |
|
Speaker Recognition
How it Works:
User speaks into microphone his password or access phrase. Verification
time is approximately 5 seconds.
To
prevent recorded voice use, most devices require the high and low frequencies
of the sound to match, which is difficult for many recording instruments
to recreate well. Also, some devices generate random number sequences
for each verification. |
|
Signature Biometrics

How it Works:
The user signs on a tablet or on paper that is laying over a sensor tablet.
The device records the signature and compares it to its database. Verification
takes about 5 seconds.


|
|
Keyboard Biometrics
The user types his password or phrase on the keyboard. The system then
records the timing of the typing and compares the password itself and
the timing to its database. Verification takes less than 5 seconds.
|
|
Retinal Scan Biometrics
Retinal scanning analyses the layer of blood vessels at
the back of the eye. Scanning involves using a low-intensity light source
and an optical coupler and can read the patterns at a great level of accuracy.
It does require the user to remove glasses, place their eye close to the
device, and focus on a certain point. Whether the accuracy can outweigh
the public discomfort is yet to be seen. |
|
How Retinal Scan Works
The user looks through a small opening in the device at a small green
light. The user must keep their head still and eye focused on the light
for several seconds during which time the device will verify his identity.

This process takes about 10 to 15 seconds total. |
|
History of Retinal Scan
Retina
scan is actually one of the oldest biometrics as 1930's research suggested
that the patterns of blood vessels on the back of the human eye were uniqueto
each individual.

While technology has taken more time than the theory
to be usable, EyeDentify, founded in 1976, developed The Eyedentification
system 7.5 personal identification unit, the first retina
scan device made for commercial use, in 1984. |
|
Usage of Retinal Scan
Contrary to popular public misconceptions, and reflective of what is
seen in the movies, retina
scan is used almost exclusively in high-end security applications. It
is extremely difficult to fake retinal scanners.
It is used for controlling access to areas or rooms in military installations,
power plants, and the like that are considered high risk security areas. |
|
Evaluation of Retinal Scan
Retina scan devices are probably the most accurate biometric available
today. The continuity of the retinal pattern throughout life and the difficulty
in fooling such a device also make it a great long-term, high-security
option. |
|
A Concise Definition of Biometrics
Biometrics are automated methods of recognizing a person based
on a physiological or behavioral characteristic.
They include fingerprints, retinal and iris scanning, hand and finger
geometry, voice patterns, facial recognition, and other techniques. The
biometric technologies are becoming the foundation of an extensive array
of highly secure identification and personal verification solutions.
|
|
How Can Biometrics Help National Security?
Biometrics is expected to be incorporated in solutions to provide for
Homeland Security including applications for improving airport security,
strengthening our national borders, in travel documents, visas and in
preventing ID theft. Now, more than ever, there is a wide range of interest
in biometrics across federal, state, and local governments. Congressional
offices and a large number of organizations involved in many markets are
addressing the important role that biometrics will play in identifying
and verifying the identity of individuals and protecting national assets.
|
|
How About Other Applications?
There are many needs for biometrics beyond Homeland Security...
- Enterprise-wide network security infrastructures,
- Secure electronic banking, investing and other financial transactions,
- Retail sales,
- Law enforcement, and
- H ealth and social services
... are already benefiting from these technologies. A range of new
applications can been found in such diverse environments as amusement
parks, banks, credit unions, and other financial organizations, Enterprise
and Government networks, passport programs and driver licenses, colleges,
physical access to multiple facilities (e.g., nightclubs) and school lunch
programs.
|
|
How are Other Applications Implemented?
Biometric-based authentication applications include workstation,
network, and domain access, single sign-on, application logon, data protection,
remote access to resources, transaction security and
Web security. Trust in these electronic transactions is essential to the
healthy growth of the global economy. Utilized alone or integrated with
other technologies such as smart cards, encryption keys and digital signatures,
biometrics are set to pervade nearly all aspects of the economy and our
daily lives. All things that a biometric
marketer can give you amount to security. There are many predictions
related, therefore, to the biometric fingerprint
industry and growth. |
|
What is the Consistency and Accuracy?
Utilizing biometrics for personal authentication is becoming
convenient and considerably more accurate than current methods (such as
the utilization of passwords or PINs). This is because biometrics links
the event to a particular individual (a password or token may be used
by someone other than the authorized user), is convenient (nothing to
carry or remember), accurate (it provides for positive authentication),
can provide an audit trail and is becoming socially acceptable and inexpensive.
|
|
|